Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Semelbauer et al v. Muskegon, County et al
as 1:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Michelle Semelbauer , Paulette Bosch , Denise Vos and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS
as 1:2014cv01577
Plaintiff:
MARK BURNS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Basham v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2014cv00303
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler and Mark Burns
Plaintiff:
James Basham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harte et al v. Denning et al
as 2:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Adlynn K. Harte and Robert W. Harte
Defendant:
Johnson County, Kansas Board of Commissioners , Frank Denning , Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Citigold Auctions of South Florida, Inc.
as 6:2013mc00083
Plaintiff:
Richard Mark Burns
Defendant:
Citigold Auctions of South Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Burns v. Fischer et al
as 9:2013cv00486
Plaintiff:
Mark Burns
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Teresa Knapp-David, Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
MARK BURNS
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Carl v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Carl
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of , Mark Burns , Todd Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Hardy v. George Jurkas, et al
as 09-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN O. HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE JURKAS and MARK BURNS
Burns v. Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing Inc
as 4:2008cv03165
Plaintiff:
Mark Burns
Defendant:
Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
