Cases 11 - 20 of 4,976
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McDaniel et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Michael W. McDaniel and Sheila McDaniel
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
ZHAO LIQIN
Defendant:
MARTIN JAY MCDANIEL and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
McDaniel v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65132
Plaintiff:
Kamrynn T. McDaniel
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bohanon et al v. Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv08068
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohanon and Stephanie Dobner
Defendant:
Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated, Riverside Resort and Casino LLC, Matthew C Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Putman v. J.C. McDaniel Construction, LLC; et al
as 1:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michael Putman
Defendant:
J.C. McDaniel Construction, LLC;, Crystal Creek Inert Landfill, LLC and Jerry C. McDaniel, Jr.
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05243
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
