Cases 41 - 50 of 2,583
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKNIGHT v. MCDOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
MCDOWELL and LACOMBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reuben McDowell v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 23-3269
Plaintiff:
REUBEN MCDOWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Manuel Ortega et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas, Manuel Ortega, Ricardo Rosas and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allison, Warden Neil McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Michael McDowell
as 23-7275
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE MCDOWELL
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
McDowell v. United Fire & Casualty Company
as 4:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
United Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
