Cases 41 - 50 of 1,018
Melton v. Federal Correctional Institution McDowell et al
as 1:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wade Melton
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Warden, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PERRY v. IVICIC et al
as 3:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PERRY
Defendant:
MICHELLE IVICIC, DARREN GINTER, STEVEN BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Reed
Defendant:
James Shipman, Joe McHoney and Leslie McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell #509775 v. Enderle
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Artavius Jamal McDowell #509775
Defendant:
Unknown Enderle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyvers v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Kashajuan Lyvers
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James v. McDowell
as 23-30271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
C. McDowell, Sergeant, Dennis Grimes, Sid J. Gautreaux, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
