Cases 1 - 10 of 2,585
(PC) McDowell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Giovanni McDowell
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Jeffrey Storey, Joseph Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
McDowell v. Plymouth Township Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11029
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell
Defendant:
Plymouth Township Police Department, Plymouth Township Police Department, Commissioner of, Plymouth Township Police Department, Chief of and others
MCDOWELL v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04912
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
MARSHA MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godun, et al. v. Justanswer LLC
as 24-2095
Plaintiff:
KSENIYA GODUN, MOYA MCDOWELL, RENEE PETTIT and others
Defendant:
JUSTANSWER LLC
McKinny v. McDowell et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
N McDowell and T Brandmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
McDowell et al v. Town of Harwich et al
as 1:2024cv10798
Plaintiff:
Patrick McDowell and P.K.M. Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Harwich and Mark T. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent:
Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
