Cases 1 - 10 of 780
United States v. Alyssa Murry
as 24-1791
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alyssa Murry, also known as Alyssa Hoselton
Burgess v. Grace et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kren/Karen Y Burgess
Defendant:
Mr. Grace, Ms. Murry, Mr. August and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynne Kritter v. Brent Mooring
as 24-1158
Plaintiff:
LYNNE E. KRITTER, as Executor of the Estate of Eugene John Kritter, III and KRITTER CROPDUSTING, INC.
Defendant:
BRENT MOORING, as Administrator CTA of the Estate of Murry Rayborn Daw, DAW FARMS, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin Murry v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Calvin Murry
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
SCHUMACHER v. PATTAR TRANSPORT, INC., ET AL.
as 4:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA SCHUMACHER
Defendant:
PATTAR TRANSPORT, INC, MARK OLIN MURRY and PATTAR TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
