Cases 1 - 10 of 14,446
Wiley v. Meracle et al
as 3:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Defendant:
Seth Meracle, Johnnie Smith, Mac-Shane Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
JADEN RASHADA
Defendant:
HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services, Craig Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #243786 v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Marcus Henry Williams #243786
Defendant:
Dell Baker, M. Truxell, M. Kirky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Marcus Whybark
Defendant:
Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDANIEL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
MARCUS JERMAINE MCDANIEL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
