Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Adams v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 1:2026cv02785
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adams v. Fidelity National Title
as 6:2026cv01795
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Defendant:
Fidelity National Title
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Adams v. LVNV Funding LLC
as 6:2026cv03359
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Adams v. Santander Bank, N.A.
as 1:2026cv13267
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Defendant:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2026cv00673
Defendant:
Core Civic, (f/n/u) Iratukunda, (f/n/u) Desroches and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 5:2025cv01471
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams and Pryme Home Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Dillihunt et al v. Seths Amusement Park et al
as 2:2024cv09407
Defendant:
Christopher Abbey, Seth Anderson, Seths Amusement Park and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Cook County, Illinois
as 1:2024cv08182
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adams
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant:
RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VAIL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
SARA VAIL
Defendant:
MARCUS ADAMS and MAG CARRIERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
