Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Young et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv11986
Plaintiff:
Keith Darly Young, Robert Charles York Jr., Jennifer York and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Martin David Fox
as 2:2024rd00012
Unknown:
Martin David Fox
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13911
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MARTIN DAVID MOSLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drigotas et al v. Subaru of America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Martin David Drigotas, Jr. and Christina Irene Loome
Defendant:
Subaru of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hoyle et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2021cv02512
Plaintiff:
Martin David Hoyle and B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, James Donald Smith, Sally C. Medley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRINSON v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARTIN DAVID BRINSON
Defendant:
CHRISS DAVIS, PAMILCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BOUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrola #101473 v. Coffey et al
as 2:2016cv02938
Plaintiff:
Martin David Burrola, Jr.
Defendant:
Marlene Coffey, Unknown Moody, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERN v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv05545
Plaintiff:
MARTIN DAVID KERN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Petersen et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv09040
Plaintiff:
Martin David Petersen , Alan Royce Petersen and Triple E Farms Inc.
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
