Cases 1 - 10 of 40
SMITH et al v. MACON-BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON SMITH and MATTHEW BLAKE FULLER
Defendant:
MACON-BIBB COUNTY, Sheriff DAVID JOHN DAVIS, FREDERICK GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Morrow?Wu
as 26-1881
Defendant:
SHANGZHEN WU, MATTHEW MORROWWU, Daniel Wu and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Morrow?Wu
as 26-1752
Defendant:
SHANGZHEN WU, MATTHEW MORROWWU, Daniel Wu and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sowell v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2026cv00565
Plaintiff:
Salvatore J. Sowell
Defendant:
United States Of America, State Of Ohio, Franklin County Sheriff's Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Sandoval, et al
as 26-1166
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BLAKE REED, AKA Matthew Reed
Defendant:
STEPHANIE SANDOVAL, JOSEPH REGALADO and CARLY REY-HAYES
Ashmore-Welch v. Martin et al
as 2:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Nicole Ashmore-Welch
Defendant:
Matthew Blake Martin, Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC, Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC d/b/a Conterra Networks and others
Pretrial Service:
Randy Akin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Sara Torres v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2025cv08930
Plaintiff:
Sara Torres
Defendant:
Charles Forston, Matthew Blake, AT and T Mobility Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Birch et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11665
Plaintiff:
Adam Birch, Brad Birkes, Carmine Bitonti and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marshall v. Blake
as 3:2025cv00090
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Marshall
Defendant:
Matthew Blake and UPS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
