Cases 1 - 10 of 50
MAPLES
as 1:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PERRY MAPLES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Olsta et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03572
Plaintiff:
Kevin Olsta, Allen Feld, Anthony Clark and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perry v. West Capital Lending Inc
as 4:2026cv00094
Plaintiff:
Matthew Perry
Defendant:
West Capital Lending Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MITCHELL et al v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY et al
as 1:2026cv00708
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE MITCHELL, ROBERT MITCHELL, GERALDINE SCARFO THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, DUPONT SPECIALITY PRODUCTS USA, LLC, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Butler v. Perry et al
as 4:2025cv04213
Plaintiff:
Antonio Butler
Defendant:
Matthew Perry, Jackson Stanley, . Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakely v. McMillan, Township of, et al
as 2:2025cv00215
Plaintiff:
Mark Blakely
Defendant:
McMillian, Township of, Arthur Schultz, Marie McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
VILLANUEVA-ROSE v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2025cv00368
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA GABRIELLE VILLANUEVA-ROSE
Defendant:
NATHAN SIMMONS, MATTHEW PERRY, CONNER STEFFEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00691
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Matthew Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Perry et al
as 4:2023cv04227
Plaintiff:
Omar Ashanti Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Perry and Kroger Kling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
