Cases
Stack v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff: Gary Michael Stack
Defendant: Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kirkwood v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Sally Kirkwood
Defendant: Kent, County of, Michelle LaJoye-Young, Charles DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
STACK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00454
Petitioner: MICHAEL STACK
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30806
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STACK
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stack et al v. Hastings et al
as 5:2013cv00018
Plaintiff: Malissa Stack and Michael Stack
Defendant: Roy Hastings and Prestige Delivery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sumler v. Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv06070
Defendant: Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC and Michael Stacks
Plaintiff: Lauren Sumler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff: Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant: Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kearney v. DiManna, et al
as 04-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES F. KEARNEY
Defendant - Appellee: VINCENT DIMANNA, KEN A. OVERMAN, MARK HANEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?