Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harper v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv04626
Plaintiff:
Nicole Michelle Harper
Defendant:
Pamela Johnson and Every Federal Employee That is in a Federal Cell Charged for Nicole Michelle Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Harper v. Arrow Electronics
as 21-1011
Defendant / Appellee:
ARROW ELECTRONICS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE MICHELLE HARPER
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Harper et al
as 3:2020cv00856
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Jason Harper and Michelle Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harper v. Arrow Electronics et al
as 1:2019cv02791
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual, Arrow Electronics, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Harper and Denise Michelle Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gilstrap v. Petterson et al
as 6:2019cv01634
Plaintiff:
Olin E Gilstrap and Olin Eugene Gilstrap
Defendant:
Dawn Michelle Harper, Pete Petterson, Kim Ducan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03055
Plaintiff:
Joel Harper and Michelle Harper
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raudenbush v. Scholfield et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
George Joseph Raudenbush, III
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Bobby Straughter, Mark Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2016cv06513
Plaintiff:
Michelle Harper
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04001
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HARPER and MICHELLE HARPER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
