Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Mr. Kelly Hashey and Mrs. Kelly Hashey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasco v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Vasco
Defendant:
Ms. Young, Ms. Brown, Mr. Martin and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bul v. Joseph et al
as 1:2022cv10385
Plaintiff:
David A Bul
Defendant:
Mr Kelly C Joseph, Rebecca and Logan Airport 2 Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Friar v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Friar
Defendant:
Kevin Jackson, Jeff Darcy, J. Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01209
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Michael Allah v. Pat O'Conner, et al
as 20-3588
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERVISOR JANE DOE #1, DIRECTOR JOHN DOE #1, SUPERVISOR MR. KELLY RASCOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
Butler v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv05543
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Kelly Amanda Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00144
Not Classified By Court:
Mr. KELLY STEPHENSON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00145
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
