Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tucker v. Wetzel, et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Hassan A. Tucker
Defendant:
John E Wetzel, George Little, Correctional Officer Kimberley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Officer Rivers, Officer Reese, Brandon Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Kareem Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. TORRES et al
as 1:2021cv00173
Defendant:
CAPTAIN TORRES, OFFICER REESE, OFFICER KERSITTER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00734
Defendant:
Officer Petterson, Jonathan Jackson, Officer Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Dalvin Marquez Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIZARRO v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2020cv00257
Defendant:
LT. EYER, JOHN DOE, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and others
Plaintiff:
SHANTA PIZARRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortson v. Jamison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
David Rogers, J. Thomas, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Fortson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. King County et al
as 2:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sergeant John Doe, Jane Doe Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sergeant John Doe, Jane Doe Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Demuth v. Chenango County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Defendant:
Ernest Cutting, Corporal Collins, LT. Chris Miles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berlin v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv06046
Plaintiff:
Monica Berlin
Defendant:
LinkedIn, ProTech Security, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
