Cases 1 - 10 of 859
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Dallas County Courthouse et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Dallas County Courthouse and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ismael Padilla v. U.S. District Court for Northern District of Texas
as 24-6458
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL PADILLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PAROLES and others
Padilla v. 203rd Judicial District Courts et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
203rd Judicial District Courts, US District Court, Fifth Cir Ct of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Scott v. Padilla
as 2:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jamurl A. Scott
Defendant:
Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Savant et al
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bender
Defendant:
FNP Theresa Savant, M.D. Richard Griffin, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Padilla v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Angela Padilla
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman, Dawn Noggle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
