Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff:
TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
James Cole, Jr. v. Warden Ray
as 23-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES T. COLE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN RAY, Warden of FCI Hazelton, MR. BARNES, Case Manager Coordinator and UNKNOWN, Post Master General
DENT v. WHITE HOUSE et al
as 1:2023cv02517
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
WHITE HOUSE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karl Masek v. Rob Isonta, et al
as 22-5257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Karl Ray Masek
Defendant / Appellee:
Rob Isonta, Attorney General, Carmel Mountain Post Office, Laguna Beach Post Office and others
Brown et al v. blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
antony john blinken doing business as ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN secretary of state, et al. United States, janet louise yellen doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States, merrick garland doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, INTERNAL SERVICE REVENUE and POST MASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
