Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fear of God, LLC v. Zhong
as 2:2026cv07918
Defendant:
Zheng Zhong and Eason
Plaintiff:
Fear of God, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Eason et al v. Baldwin
as 0:2026cv03212
Plaintiff:
Yobarri Eason and Shantell Gant
Defendant:
Mark Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Eason et al v. Newrez LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01013
Plaintiff:
Olandus Eason and Tyee Eason
Defendant:
Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Meb Loan Trust Viii and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Eason et al v. REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC
as 1:2026cv05014
Plaintiff:
Ashley Eason and Kevin Martineau
Defendant:
REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Eason v. Bunker Hill City of et al
as 3:2026cv00807
Plaintiff:
Mark A Eason, Jr. and Mark Aaron Eason, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Howard, Bunker Hill City of, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. Eason et al
as 3:2026cv00817
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gaston
Defendant:
Santiago, Papoosha and Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marilyn Eason v. USA, et al
as 26-2080
Plaintiff:
MARILYN EASON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Ewing v. City of Sedro-Woolley, et al.
as 26-3218
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCOTT EWING
Defendant:
CITY OF SEDRO-WOOLLEY, BROCK D. STILES, KEVIN L. ROGERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-11757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baltas v. Quiros
as 26-1355
Plaintiff:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant:
ANGEL QUIROS, In His Individual and Official Capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SHARONDA CARLOS, In Her Individual and Official Capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
