Cases 1 - 10 of 1,900
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sonoiki v. Harvard University, et al
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
DAMILARE SONOIKI
Defendant:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY, HARVARD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF OVERSEERS and PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
SARAH RANKIN
Williams v. Rankins, Woods
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Sylvia Rankins, Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Tessier et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marain Larayonda Rankins
Defendant:
Dr. Tessier, Dr. Stacy, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
Mixson v. Louisiana Horticulture Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angele Mixson
Defendant:
Louisiana Horticulture Commission, Rob Barry, III, George Bofinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
