Cases 51 - 60 of 726
Bryant v. Rettig et al
as 6:2023cv06018
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Charles Rettig and Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrel Fisher v. Maureen Reardon
as 23-6004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREL R. FISHER
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN REARDON, SARAH RALSTON and JUDGE W. EARL BRITT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benchmark Insurance Company v. 21st Century Painting & Roofing, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Insurance Company
Defendant:
21st Century Painting & Roofing, LLC and John Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Trotman v. McCoy et al
as 9:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff McCoy, Christine Onley, Patrick Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belcher v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv00472
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher and Shawn Lasater
Respondent:
Governor Brad Little, Ada County Prosecutor, Judge Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff:
RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cato v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jason ET Cato and Jason Cato
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, Schneider, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reardon v. Flemming et al
as 4:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Jeff B. Reardon
Defendant:
Robin Flemming, Tiffany Jones, Santana Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
