Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv02020
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. State of GA
as 1:2019cv04177
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones and Masabi Olewan Ali
Defendant:
State of GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Harris County Sheriff's
as 4:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's, Harris County, Harris County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Jones v. USA
as 2:2018cv03110
Defendant:
Joshua Root, Peter Sawtell and USA
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00508
Defendant:
MDOC, MTC, Lt. R. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Leronia Reed, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regenerative Wellness Center, LLC v. Otey et al
as 4:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Rodney Jones, TJS Holdings LLC, John Fogarty and others
Plaintiff:
Regenerative Wellness Center LLC and Regenerative Wellness Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Long v. Burkes et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Rodney Jone
as 17-3449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY JONES
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05999
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhou Ping, Zhou Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
