Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Watkins et al v. Gill et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marc Watkins and Randi Watkins
Defendant:
James D. Gill, Jr. and Chad Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68264
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00288
Plaintiff:
Randy Watkins
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv05224
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Randy Watkins and Jisica Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02923
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Randy Watkins and Jisica Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. Parkerson et al
as 5:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mills
Defendant:
Parkerson and Randy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
smith v. Watkins et al
as 4:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
james joseph smith
Defendant:
Randy Watkins, J. Thomson , S. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santiago v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2013cv01886
Plaintiff:
Javier Santiago
Defendant:
Westchester County, R. Jones, LA. Spaluding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Edward Padilla
Defendant:
Westchester County, W.C.D.O.C., Yozzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smoot v. Watkins Trucking Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv01461
Plaintiff:
Emmett Smoot
Defendant:
Watkins Trucking Company, Inc., Pell City Tractor & Equipment LLC, R&D Truck Repair and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
