Cases 51 - 60 of 533
Byrd v. Colbourne
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Byrd
Defendant:
Colbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Colbourne
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Byrd
Defendant:
Warden Ms. Colbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04961
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS HUNT, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. NC Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Marketa Ann Rogers
Defendant:
NC Enterprises LLC, LTI Trucking Services Inc, Robert Thomas Rourke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Filed in Error
as 4:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
James Allen, Robert Thomas, Allan Haye and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
PCF Properties ofTexas LLC, Elizabeth Thomas and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Thomas et al v. PCF Properties of Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
James Allen, Robert Thomas and Allan Haye
Defendant:
PCF Properties of Texas LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Elizabeth Thomas and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
In Re: Thomas
as 22-1155
Petitioner:
ROBERT THOMAS
Respondent:
DEBORAH G. SCHULT, Warden, FCI Berlin
Thomas v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Thomas v. Stringer
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Floyd Robert Thomas
Defendant:
B. Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, COLEMAN MCDONOUGH, SCOTT SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
