Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Jones v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Jones
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Eddie Hartline, Mina Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Queen v. Collier
as 5:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Queen
Defendant:
Christopher Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altman v. S & S Towing & Trucking Service, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03112
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Altman
Defendant:
S & S Towing & Trucking Service, LLC , Ghilotti Brothers Construction, Inc. and John Paul Maes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodney Beckham v. Cookie Crew
as 10-6343
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY DOUGLAS BECKHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
COOKIE CREWS, Warden
Beckham v. Donahue
as 2:2009cv00106
Petitioner:
Rodney Douglas Beckham
Respondent:
J. David Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas, et al v. Bausch & Lomb Inc
as 2:2008cv03948
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas, Rodney Douglas, Rodney Douglas and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc and others
Special Master:
Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rodney Griffee v. USDC-ORP
as 08-71797
:
In re: RODNEY DOUGLAS GRIFFEE
Petitioner:
RODNEY DOUGLAS GRIFFEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Griffee v. Fisher
as 4:2008cv00270
Petitioner:
Rodney Douglas Griffee
Respondent:
Scott P Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Griffee v. USA
as 3:2007cv70025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodney Douglas Griffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Griffee v. USA
as 3:2007cv70024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodney Douglas Griffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
