Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Hommel v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Brandon K. Hommel
Respondent:
U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio, Dr. S. Hughes Melton, Mark Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK S. HUGHES
HUGHES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv01809
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, CARL KUENZLI, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gupta v. Northam et al
as 6:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alisha Gupta
Defendant:
Dick Roberts, Daniel Carey, Ralph Northam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Loving El et al v. Minnesota Dept. of Corr. et al
as 0:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Dornbach, J. Doeden, Kathryn Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Lovell N. Oates El and Ronelle R. Loving El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Zimmerman et al
as 3:2018cv02050
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Feloncamp, Lieutenant Biederman, Officer Poupard and others
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patriot Industrial LLC v. Patriot Partners LLC et al
as 8:2018cv01396
Plaintiff:
Patriot Industrial LLC
Defendant:
Patriot Partners LLC, Patriot Solutions LLC, Group of Patriots LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Chien v. Commonwealth of VA
as 18-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VA, MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY and others
Gregory Perry v. Michael Paris
as 18-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PARIS, Regional Jail Facility Contractor of the same, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, and unknown officers, agents and employees of the same, ROGERS and others
Hughes v. Ames et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tracey S. Hughes
Defendant:
M. Ames, J. Mejia and J. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
