Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Lynch v. Denney
as 4:2010cv00445
Petitioner:
Jason S. Lynch
Respondent:
Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Young
as 2:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
William S Lynch
Defendant:
J P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lynch v. Young
as 2:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
William S Lynch
Defendant:
J P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENNEBUNK SAVINGS BANK v. LOLLIPOP TREE INC et al
as 2:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
KENNEBUNK SAVINGS BANK
Defendant:
LOLLIPOP TREE INC , ROBERT S LYNCH and LAURIE V LYNCH
Receiver:
JAMES C EBBERT
Counter_claimant:
LAURIE V LYNCH , LOLLIPOP TREE INC and ROBERT S LYNCH
Counter_defendant:
KENNEBUNK SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lynch v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company et al
as 5:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Lynch and Jason S. Lynch
Defendant:
Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lynch v. Arenac, County of et al
as 1:2008cv14501
Plaintiff:
Amy S Lynch
Defendant:
Arenac, County of, Gary Rapp, Robert J Lesneski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv00322
Petitioner:
David S. Lynch
Respondent:
Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fallert v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 1:2004cv11812
Plaintiff:
David O. Fallert and Gilliam Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Company, Incorporated, FMR Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Haugen Plaintiffs and Bennett Plaintiffs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
