Cases 1 - 10 of 2,647
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Khazin v. City of New York
as 24-1236
Plaintiff:
Sergeant VALENTIN KHAZIN and LAWRENCE HAWKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, SYLVESTER GE, JOHN SANFORD and others
BANKS et al v. BOSWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JALEN BANKS and DONAVAN SANFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS BOSWELL, BOSWELL FARMS ENTERPRISES LLC, BOSWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
King v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Sheriff Yesenia L. Sanchez, Marcella Hardy, Alan Horwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sanford v. Kirst
as 24-30282
Plaintiff:
Jeffry L. Sanford, Individually, and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph Sanford
Defendant:
Joshua Kirst, H. Allen and City of Baton Rouge
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sanford v. AT&T
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
Henderson v. Price et al
as 6:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Felicia Henderson
Defendant:
Isaiah Price, Joshua Memminger, Dwayne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
