Cases 41 - 50 of 7,793
Skinner et al v. Velvet Rope LLC
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Gray, Cora Skinner, Jamillette Gaxiola and others
Defendant:
Velvet Rope LLC doing business as Velvet Rope
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnston v. Big Daddy Cab Company et al
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Big Daddy Cab Company, THC Cab Company, Cue Cab Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Israel v. Carter, et al.
as 24-1974
Plaintiff:
AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL
Defendant:
RUBY CARTER, SHAWNTEL SNOW, DAWN SANTOS and others
Pitts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Sara R Pitts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ward v. Gregory et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tylier D Ward
Defendant:
Keith Gregory, Chief Cantrell, Sara Summerall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
