Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Evan Cuff v. American Tire Distributors Inc, et al
as 21-3153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVAN CUFF
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC, DBA American Tire Distributors and KEVIN SOTAK, Individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Bontemps v. Sotak, et al
as 19-15848
Defendant / Appellee:
SOTAK, Dr. and SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS
Defendant:
KELLY L. CANNON, M.A., TIDWELL and SLAYBALL, Sgt.
Sotak v. Bertoni et al
as 3:2018cv00288
Defendant:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 3, Thomas R. Augostini and others
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Sotak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Calvin W Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport and B M Sotak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sotak et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33021
Plaintiff:
Susan T. Sotak and Michael Sotak
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel Delgado v. David Ballard
as 12-6360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL DELGADO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, CLARENCE J. RIDER, JAMES MCCLOUD and others
Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2011cv00353
Defendant:
County of Sacramento , John McGinness, Ann Marie Boylan and others
Plaintiff:
Sandipkumar Tandel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stringfellow v. McGinness et al
as 2:2010cv02988
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stringfellow
Defendant:
John McGinness, County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
