Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Washington v. Michigan, State of, et al.
as 4:2023mc50929
Petitioner:
Lafonza Earl Washington, Sr.
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Genesee, County of, Office of David S. Leyton and others
EVERAGE et al v. BUNNING et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
TIM SHORT, DAVID L BUNNING, VONCIL THACKER and others
Plaintiff:
EVERAGE REAL ESTATE INC, MARY JOE BUNDY EVERAGE, MARY JOE EVERAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00866
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00663
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
American Bank Center v. Barker
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
American Bank Center
Defendant:
Stephen D. Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Adams v. Barry Parson
as 13-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN P. BARKER, JR., all individually and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARRY PARSONS, M. G. ROBINSON, R. D. SIZEMORE and others
Stephen Barker v. USA
as 12-5636
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN RICHARDS BARKER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barker v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00018
Petitioner:
Stephen Richards Barker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stephen Richards Barker v. United State
as 11-1748
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stephen Richards Barker
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Barker v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2010cv04873
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Richards Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
