Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Derek Antol v. Robert English, et al
as 25-2054
Plaintiff:
DEREK ANTOL
Defendant:
ROBERT S. ENGLISH, RYAN DANGL, VICTORIA BORDNER and others
STIMAC v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv01805
Petitioner:
KELLY STIMAC
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HAYS v. BUCKSHIRE et al
as 2:2025cv01201
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAYS
Defendant:
TRAVIS J. BUCKSHIRE and MATTHEW STIMAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stimac v. MedStar Health Inc.
as 1:2025cv01693
Plaintiff:
Thy Ma Stimac
Defendant:
MedStar Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Bartles v. Larimer County Sheriff, et al
as 25-1166
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN BARTLES
Defendant:
LARIMER COUNTY SHERIFF, WLATER STULLER, JACKIE STIMAC and others
Antol v. English et al
as 1:2025cv00170
Plaintiff:
Derek Antol
Defendant:
Robert English, Ryan Dangl, Victoria Bordner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Larriett v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00509
Defendant:
Winn Everhart, Michael Chamberlin, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dakarai Larriett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Stimac et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carrie Lynn Stimac, Karl Josef Polutnik and Rebecca Lynn Polutnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Bartles (PS) v. Sazama et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartles
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, James Sazama, Jackie Stimac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Pritchard Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pritchard Engineering, Inc., Latoya A. Sanchez and Angela Stimac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
