Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SULFRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07947
Plaintiff:
DUSTY SULFRIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SULFRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92234
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SULFRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULFRIDGE v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00602
Petitioner:
RUSSELL SULFRIDGE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sulfridge v. Loancare, LLC
as 6:2017cv01350
Plaintiff:
Jody Sulfridge
Defendant:
Loancare, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Sulfridge et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09485
Plaintiff:
Jody Sulfridge and Carlos Sulfridge
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Harrison Sulfridge
as 14-5723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HARRISON B. SULFRIDGE
Green v. Gorden et al
as 5:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Defendant:
D Gorden, Ruloff Turner, Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candice Sulfridge, et al v. John Huff, et al
as 07-6180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CANDICE R. SULFRIDGE and ADAM T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN HUFF
Defendant:
LARRY G. MOORE, JANETTE HARRIS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sulfridge
as 3:2007cv01173
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Michael W Sulfridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Dubose et al v. Morristown Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Brett R Dubose, Brett R Dubose, Jodie R Philpot and others
Defendant:
Morristown Police Department, Roger Overholt, Jason Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
