Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Taylor v. City Of Sherman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Amos L. Mazzant, III, Bob Utter Towing, Midway Storage Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Harmon L Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Williams v. SC Workers' Compensation
as 20-1078
Defendant / Appellee:
T. SCOTT BECK, SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, AISHA TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS
HAMILTON v. CLEAN SWEEP PLUS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00529
Defendant:
CLEAN SWEEP PLUS, INC., CARMEN RAMSEY and T. SCOTT RAMSEY
Plaintiff:
CIARA HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. USA
as 3:2019cv00977
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jaquirro T Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott v. State Of Florida
as 1:2019cv22489
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
Andrew T Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2019cv00728
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Scott
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Lonnie Nail, Jesse Jimerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03777
Plaintiff:
Skylar J Scott-Watkins, Jy'air T Scott-Watkins and Gerard A Watkins, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. South Carolina Workers Compensation Commission et al
as 4:2019cv01340
Defendant:
South Carolina Workers Compensation Commission, Aisha Taylor, Gene McCaskill and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohen #182201 v. Scott et al
as 2:2019cv02893
Plaintiff:
Paul Cohen
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, T Scott, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook v Scott et al
as 2:2019cv00108
Defendant:
HENIFF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, LLC, CLIFFORD T. SCOTT, JR., Heniff Transportation Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA HOLBROOK
Not Yet Classified:
Daniel W Glavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
