Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Tiffany Smith v. Shelbie Smith
as 24-3251
Petitioner:
TIFFANY SMITH
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
FRANCIS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
LLOYD FRANCIS
Defendant:
AMBER TIFFANY SMITH, DELTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT, JOELLE SHANESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiffany Smith v. Shelbie Smith
as 23-3590
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIFFANY SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
Smith v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Smith and Tiffany R Smith
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds Restaurants of Arizona Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Smith
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achane et al v. Tolbert et al
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Achane, Natasha Adams, Kayla Anderson and others
Defendant:
Jim Tolbert, EFG General Partner Corp., Education Futures Management, Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Smith v. Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00097
Petitioner:
Tiffany Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
