Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Metaxas v. Lee et al
as 3:2019cv03819
Plaintiff:
Poppi Metaxas
Defendant:
Lawrence Wang, Kenneth Lee, Dale McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tacorey Gilliam v. Anderson County Sheriff Dept, et al
as 19-40384
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU PIERSON, FNU HIGGINS, FNU CHOLK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACOREY GILLIAM
Case Transferred to Lufkin, 9:18cv163
as 6:2018cv00441
Defendant:
Darrel Bobbit, Matt Jackson, Jerry Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Christoph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Anderson County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2017cv00696
Plaintiff:
Tacorey Gilliam
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff Department, FNU Higgins, FNU Cholk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grade Results Inc v. Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Grade Results Inc
Defendant:
Russell Johnson , Beverly Malone , Tim Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOLDS v. HART et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNIS REYNOLDS
Defendant:
DAVID HART, MELVIN RAY, ROSCOE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. Green et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Tim Green, SHANE GOSA, CHRISTOPHER JANOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doss v. Alexander, City of et al
as 4:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher Doss
Defendant:
Alexander, City of, Horace Walters, Jeffrey Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rafael Jones, Sr. v. United States, et al
as 12-2952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Missouri and Tim Green
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
