Cases 21 - 30 of 383
Stepp v. Tew
as 3:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Shawn David Stepp
Defendant:
Robert S Tew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Stokes v. Madina et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Edward Stokes
Defendant:
E. Madina, Steven Dollinger and A. Tew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepp v. Tew
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Shawn David Stepp
Defendant:
Robert S. Tew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Riteway Truck and Auto et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Riteway Truck and Auto doing business as KO Towing Comp, Mr. Ray Tews, Gregory, Dole, Calhoun, and Rogers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carolyn Tews v. Terrell
as 23-10048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN LUKE TEWS
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRELL
Edgar v. Brunson et al (CONSENT)
as 1:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wayne Edgar
Defendant:
Marion Brunson, Justin A Spence, Anthony Tew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eugenia Carazo-Tew et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07403
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Carazo-Tew and David Tew
Petitioner:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Flagstar Bank
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, NPA Associates, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination
Ricks v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2022cv05164
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Parish of Morehouse, City of Bastrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
