Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davis et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jessica Davis and Thomas Head
Defendant:
Tammy Lee, Elizabeth Brown and City of Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Head v. Wise
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Head
Defendant:
Rhea Lee Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Head v. Cho
as 1:2021cv05719
Plaintiff:
Thomas Head
Defendant:
Dong Cho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ables v. Knighten
as 20-61144
Defendant / Appellee:
Angela Brown, CNP, Centurion of MS, L.L.C., Medical Company-Providor, Vicky Thomas, Head Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jon J. Ables
Brent W. Cook v. Michael Wade
as 15-6937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT WILLIAM COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff, YVETTE KING, Psychologist and MICHAEL THOMAS, Head of Mental Health
Head et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ruth B. Head and James Thomas Head
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Phanpradith v. CCA, et al
as 13-17296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM PHANPRADITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TODD THOMAS, Head Warden at S.C.C., BENJAMIN GRIEGO, Assistant Warden at S.C.C. and others
Witwicki v. Circuit Court of Coffee County, et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00920
Plaintiff:
William Witwicki
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Coffee County , Shannon R. Clark , James M. Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brent Cook v. Michael Wade
as 12-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT WILLIAM COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL L. WADE, Sheriff, YVETTE KING, Psychologist and MICHAEL THOMAS, Head of Rise Program/Jail East
Selective Way Ins Co v. Thomas Head
as 11-2283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SELECTIVE WAY INS CO
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS HEAD, individually and trading as Head & Son Home Improvement
Movant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. IANNUZZI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
