Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wilkins et al v. Owens
as 1:2026cv03616
Petitioner:
Latonya K. Wilkins and Timothy Lee Wilkins
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LITTLE v. STEWART
as 3:2026cv00061
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY LEE LITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN VERONICA STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabrera et al v. Iran
as 1:2026mc00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Cabrera, SGT Jared Lemon, K.L. and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Rucker v. Tabor et al
as 1:2026cv00384
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Rucker
Defendant:
Inspector Jon Tabor, John Does 1-10 and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Gibson v. Dauphin County Adult Probation, et al
as 26-1891
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE GIBSON
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY ADULT PROBATION, HARRISBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, APO BRUCE CUTTER, Adult Probation Officer and others
Willis v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 2:2026cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jordan Willis
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company and Timothy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Timothy Claridy v. US
as 26-1137
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE CLARIDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER KEITH GLADSTONE, UNKNOWN FEDERAL OFFICERS and others
REED v. RILEY et al
as 2:2026cv00053
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE REED
Defendant:
RILEY, PEAZE, THOTHAIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Dauphin County Adult Probation et al
as 1:2025cv02375
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Gibson
Defendant:
Dauphin County Adult Probation, Harrisburg City Police Department, APO Bruce Cutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2025cv81476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
