Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peters v. YKK AP America Inc.
as 1:2026cv03820
Plaintiff:
Tyler Peters
Defendant:
YKK AP America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
NELSON v. ULTA SALON, COSMETICS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
as 1:2025cv02421
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE NELSON
Defendant:
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS AND FRAGRANCE, INC., PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS ZURANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Sigers v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Emmett Sigers
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins, Covington County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Shapiro (Gramins)
as 21-5
Defendant:
Ross Shapiro and Tyler Peters
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Gramins
Tyler Burkey v. Heather Hunter, et al
as 19-3269
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER CARL VATH, MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO, DEPUTY SHERIFF HEATHER HUNTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER BURKEY, Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Burkey
United States of America v. Shapiro (Gramins)
as 18-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Gramins
Defendant:
Ross Shapiro and Tyler Peters
Williamson v. Peters et al
as 2:2017mc00205
Plaintiff:
Darcy D. Williamson
Defendant:
Tyler Peters and Payne & Jones, Chrtd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Burkey v. Hunter et al
as 4:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Tyler Burkey
Defendant:
Heather Hunter , Carl Vath , Tyler Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parris et al v. Cabral
as 1:2013cv11010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parris , James Antonetti , John Barry and others
Defendant:
Andrea J. Cabral
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
