Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GalloglyIn re: Gallogly
as 19-121
Respondent:
U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Petitioner:
In re: REBECCA GALLOGLY
Jack Allen v. USA, et al
as 17-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOLICITOR GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Driver v. U.S. Special Master et al
as 1:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver
Defendant:
U.S. Special Master, Clark Kelso, U.S. Dept. of State Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamontree v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Hamontree
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, State of California, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO et al
as 2:2011cv06251
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE FULLERTON MPO, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Nelson v. Jennifer Joyce, et al
as 08-1227
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alexander Nelson
Respondent - Appellee:
Jennifer M. Joyce, Donald K. Tyson, Lisa Vanamburg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
