Cases 1 - 10 of 100
VINCENT v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
ANGELA VINCENT
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
DWYER v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2026cv05599
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA DWYER
Defendant:
MARK A. DOUGLAS, ANDREW D. SANDIFER, PIERRE R. BRONDEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ambiance GR, LLC, et al v. Mark Washington, et al
as 26-1675
Plaintiff:
AMBIANCE GR, LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Corporation and JAMAL CHILTON
Defendant:
MARK WASHINGTON, City Manager, MINDY YSASI, City Commissioner, JOE JONES, City Commissioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06445
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Securian Life Insurance Company v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2026cv05506
Plaintiff:
Securian Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Vincent Andre Lowe and Ovidiu Maris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Kane et al v. Lee Loi Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04798
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kane, Jr., Charles Machadio, Anthony Rosa and others
Defendant:
Lee Loi Industries, Inc. and Wai Wah Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BEARD v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2026cv05603
Plaintiff:
MARK BEARD
Defendant:
MARK A. DOUGLAS, ANDREW D. SANDIFER, PIERRE R. BRONDEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Milton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv04753
Plaintiff:
Cameron Milton
Defendant:
City of New York, Sgt. Karl Hanisch, Ofc. Herrrnan Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
