Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jackson v. Bing et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Eric Todd Jackson
Defendant:
Christy Arwood Bing, Edward E. DeWerff, John W. Carrey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. Adams
as 4:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
Clifton Wayne Shelton
Defendant:
Monica R Adams and Melissa D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH-EL v. ALTICE
as 1:2018cv03452
Defendant:
BRIAN MURPHY, MARC ROTHENBERG, ANN FLANNELLY and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. T. Marzetti Company
as 1:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Shelton and Larry Wayne Smith
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Great West Casualty Company
Defendant:
T. Marzetti Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zimmerman v. City of Owensboro et al
as 4:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert Zimmerman
Defendant:
City of Owensboro, Owensboro Police Department, Ed Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendell Brown v. Wayne Shelton
as 17-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as MENES ANKH EL
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE SHELTON
US v. Randy Shelton
as 17-4096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WAYNE SHELTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ANKH EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
SHEILA CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, DANIEL HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendell Brown v. State of Indiana, et al
as 16-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE SHELTON, Prosecutor (herein known as State of Indiana), Detective, in professional and private capacities, STATE OF INDIANA, MARC ROTHENBERG, Executive Administrator, in professional and private capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
