Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Michael Wright v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 16-56887
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Fahnestock et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01013
Plaintiff:
Princess Fahnestock , David Abraham , James Alderson and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH , Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC.
as 2:2015cv07455
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Wright v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Wright
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America et al v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Wilson County, Tennesssee et al
as 3:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Wilson County, Tennesssee, Earl Wayne Wright and Helen Wright
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In re: Michael Wright
as 13-15552
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL WAYNE WRIGHT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Timothy Wright v. Warden Ponton
as 13-7211
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN PONTON
Salters v. Wright et al
as 4:2013cv01536
Plaintiff:
Richard D Salters, II
Defendant:
Wayne Wright and Eric McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
