Cases 1 - 10 of 1,425
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv05846
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH LLC and HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wellpath Holdings, Inc. v. Guirola
as 2:2024cv14132
Plaintiff:
Wellpath Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Zela Guirola
Ragan #314744 v. Wellpath Medical Provider et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ragan #314744
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Provider, Sarah Riley, Michael Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Alphonso Bell v. Moore
as 24-6408
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
Defendant:
MOORE, Deputy, HIRST, Lt. Sheriff, DOLAN, Nurse, Wellpath and others
Sabo v. McHenry County et al
as 3:2024cv50164
Plaintiff:
Todd Sabo
Defendant:
McHenry County, Robb Tadelman, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Dailey v. Wellpath et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dailey
Defendant:
Wellpath, Dinesh Nagar, Michael McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD, OFC. GLASSCOCK, WELLPATH, LLC d/b/a/ CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Dr Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
