Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tracy Wendell Adams v. Doerer
as 2:2023cv09875
Petitioner:
Tracy Wendell Adams
Respondent:
Warden Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
US v. Tracy Adam
as 17-6041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TRACY WENDELL ADAMS
Adams v. USA
as 2:2016cv00337
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tracy Wendell Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03759
Plaintiff:
Wendell Adams, II
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Wendell Adams, II
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. SCI Georgia Funeral Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01854
Plaintiff:
John Wendell Adams
Defendant:
SCI Georgia Funeral Services, Inc. and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al v. The Yankee Candle Company
as 4:2010cv01184
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company , Wendell Adams and Walter H. Snyder
Defendant:
The Yankee Candle Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Mt Ida Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2009cv06101
Plaintiff:
Mark E Campbell
Defendant:
Mt Ida Arkansas, City of, Wendell Adams, Gary D Hogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Mt Ida Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
Mark E Campbell
Defendant:
Mt Ida Arkansas, City of, Wendell Adams, Gary D Hogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Arkansas, State of, et al
as 4:1978cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Douglas W Harp , Lawrence E Gwyn and others
Intervenor:
Wendell Adams , Larry Astin , Ron Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
