Cases 41 - 50 of 88
James Johnson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-1760
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Wesley Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Johnson v. Kelly et al
as 5:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Charles Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
James Gibson , William Kirk and Connie Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Leon Bordegaray v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2014cv08610
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Leon Bordegaray
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Brown, Sheriif Bill Brown, Sgt Daniel Calderon and others
Wesley Johnson v. Theo Glover, et al
as 14-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THEO GLOVER, DEVLIN JOSEPH SCHOOP, GREGORY ROBERT JAMES, JR. and others
JOHNSON v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv01167
Plaintiff:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Kennedy
as 4:2014cv00413
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
Chelsea Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cofield et al v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2014cv02051
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield, Michael Allen and John Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, Maryland Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Glover et al
as 3:2014cv50129
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr. and Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
Theo Glover, Devlin J. Schoop, Gregory R. James, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD et al v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD, MICHAEL ALLEN and JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keith Johnson v. St. Mary's Correctional Center
as 14-6340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. MARY'S CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ADMIN. SERV. ASST. KAREN TOWNSEND, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
