Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Puffinberger et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant: Navistar Inc., Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company, Sundyne Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Gilbert "John" Puffinberger and Francis Puffinberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Connie Dietrich v. The Boeing Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56409
Defendant: SOCO WEST, INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO-Lynch Corporation successor in interest to Western Chemical and Manufacturing, Co., WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Dougla Aircraft Company
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09064
Defendant: The Boeing Company, United Technologies Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Arthur Rosengren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marietta Yaw, et al v. GE, et al
as 19-35816
Defendant / Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, also as successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant: WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, VIKING PUMP, INC., GARDNER-DENVER, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DONALD ARTHUR YAW
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIETTA DIANNE YAW, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Donald Arthur Yaw
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15284
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
TONER et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al
as 2:2019cv02932
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, GARDNER DENVER, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD TONER and HENDERIKA TONER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Connie Dietrich v. Autozone West, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04291
Defendant: Autozone West, Inc., The Boeing Company, Borgwarner Morse TEC LLC as Successor-By-Merger to Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Dietrich Connie and Connie Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Biagetti v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00194
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc., Columbia Boiler Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Marilyn Biagetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Dorothy Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1391
Defendant: THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith
Defendant / Appellee: SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC and FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?