Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-3421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, St. Charles County Correctional Center, St. Peters Police Department and others
Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-1868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri, St. Charles County Correctional Center, St. Peters Police Department and others
Curtis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Dustin Patrick Curtis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, St. Charles County Correctional Center, St. Peters Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Unknown Medical Staff et al
as 5:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gomez
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Staff, Unknown Medical Administrators and Whoever else the Court deems fit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALTER v. WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
as 2:2020cv00456
Plaintiff:
TRACEY LAMOUAR SALTER, II and GODLY DASYPUL
Defendant:
WHOEVER THIS CONCERNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. Whoever
as 3:2019cv02485
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Whoever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nichols v. Foulds et al
as 3:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Christian Nichols
Defendant:
D.L. Foulds, A. Himes, James Wiessinger, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason David Yonai v. Anthony T. Luong et al
as 2:2015cv05066
Defendant:
Grant T. Fujioka, Anthony T. Luong, Chuong M. Luong and others
Plaintiff:
Jason David Yonai
Falls v. Whoever is the owner of the jail or admissions
as 2:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
James Falls
Defendant:
Whoever is the owner of the jail or admissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason David Yonai v. The Big Four Music Group et al
as 2:2013cv07938
Defendant:
Interscope Records, Jimmy Iovine, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Jason David Yonai
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
