Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 158,091
Zappone v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brittany Dawn Zappone
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Guel v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03065
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Edith Guel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Yungk v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Emma Yungk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Jumper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Monica Ann Jumper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
JIMENEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beahn v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Myers v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Clarence Everett Myers
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TODARO v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03762
Plaintiff:
JAMES TODARO
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Whitney v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Terrance Chaz Whitney
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision
Chavis v. Disability Determination Services
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Chavis
Defendant:
Disability Determination Services
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
