Cases 61 - 70 of 248
MINGO et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, ANDRE CHAMBERS, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and others
Plaintiff:
Jace Hyman, Jaden Hyman, W. DANIEL GRIST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Walters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Walters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tammy Skidmore v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 19-2482
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Virginia corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY A. SKIDMORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kitts v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00916
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kitts
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LEE et al v. EWART et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Plaintiff:
RONNIE W. LEE, II and AKRESHA LEE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., LARRY WAYNE EWART and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Goggins v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 7:2019cv00783
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jamar Goggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Matriculated Services, LLC
as 1:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Matriculated Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
